Blogger Reactions
Kenn, who writes a soccer focused blog, thinks it is crazy to try and compete with the NFL. He picks apart Cuban’s first post about the matter.
Daily News Rush has
a list of suggestions for the UFL.
Each state gets one team - so the name of the team from Texas is UFL-Texas ‘whatever mascot name you choose’, from Mexico it’s UFL-Mexico ‘geo area or mascot name’. That’s more than enough teams - the NFL only has 32 teams. Certainly, if Mexico wants to divvy up their country into geographical areas, that would be fine. But, just do the math - start with the 50 United States, add a few teams each from Mexico and Canada for starters and you’ve already basically doubled the size of the NFL. Players should come from the town where the team is located. This is the KEY to UFL SUCCESS! This is what has always been the downfall of the NFL - there is no loyalty, no reason to support one city over another. There must be some connection between the player and the city he plays for - either he was born there, went to school there, or will attend college there. Taking a player from Texas and putting him in a Wisconsin uniform just seems wrong. Take advantage of the natural human instinct to protect and root for its territories.
Some ideas are better than others.
Mark Bryon is not betting against Mark Cuban
The UFL is heading to virgin (or at least NFL-unattached) territory, with proposed teams in LA, Las Vegas and Mexico City. There are a number of other big cities that could support a pro team. San Antonio had a trial run as the home of the Saints post-Katrina and could support a pro football team. Memphis would be another place that could do well; they didn’t do too well as the temporary home of the Oilers/Titans, but might shine to an UFL club. Orlando, Columbus, something in the northeast, and possibly a couple of Canadian cities might be other prospects. That might be enough, for 8-10 teams might do just fine for starters.
I think that San Antonio observation is right on.
The Sports Law blog looks at the implications for Sherman Anti-Trust provisions with a league that has teams with split ownership, such as the how UFL looks to be set up.
The Sports Column Blog thinks they could be on to
something here.
Who knows whether the UFL will play a single snap but it sounds like they have their thinking together and this isn’t just some gimmicky WWF meets NBC desperation for Football league. Getting Mark Cuban on board is key. He is the ultimate self promoter and his involvement makes this venture much more likely to succeed. While we love the NFL and think they can do no wrong, a competitor would only do the fans good.
Agreed.
Meanwhile
Josh Alper at The Feed sees another reason why the UFL
is destined for success
Unlike the USFL there’s no plan to challenge the NFL for the highest profile players and the $30 million buy-in is paltry when compared to the $800 million it takes to get an expansion franchise. The growth of cable television and outrageous television rights fees for mainstream pro sports makes it easier to secure space on programming schedules and judging from the growth of the Arena league there’s a thirst for football in this country that can’t be quenched.
The low buy-in is a lesson learned by the failure of the WUSA (which is planning a comeback with a lower buy-in, btw). Of course, that low buy-in gives you an idea of what the starting salaries will be like.
Finally, USAToday’s sports blog wonders half-seriously if this isn’t just some plot to accelerate the NFL’s return to Los Angeles. That might work for San Antonio too.
One final note, isn’t there already a UFL out there? The Ultimate Frisbee League. Let’s hope there are no comparisons to that sport.